Analysis Report - 2025-11-21
📱 Download Now On Google Play 🔮 View PredictionsSports Prediction Analysis: Accurate Calls in a Day of Competitive Football
Introduction
The latest round of football matches across Europe brought a blend of expected results and surprises, testing both defensive and offensive strengths. This analysis reviews the accuracy of multiple prediction types—1x2, over/under (1.5, 2.5, 3.5 goals), and predictions on both teams scoring—evaluating the outcomes and the on-field trends uncovered across competitions.
Analysis: Troyes’ narrow away win validated the double-chance prediction, showcasing their ability to secure results on the road against balanced opposition.
Analysis: A convincing win for Versailles 78, highlighting their attacking potential. Chateauroux's defense was outclassed, making the double-chance prediction secure by halftime.
Analysis: Four goals were scored as both teams showcased attacking intent. Jong AZ exploited spaces, and MVV Maastricht’s defense could not contain the threat, confirming the over 2.5 goals forecast.
Analysis: A tight encounter with few chances, reflective of two teams prioritizing defense. The prediction held as neither side could break through consistently.
Analysis: The match defied expectations, with four goals scored. Versailles 78’s efficiency in attack and Chateauroux's aggressive approach led to a high-scoring contest, exposing vulnerabilities in the original prediction.
Analysis: Cambuur controlled the game and scored twice, but ADO Den Haag failed to provide the expected attacking resistance. Solid home defense kept the total below the projected threshold.
Analysis: Three goals were scored, but defenses tightened at key moments. Both sides were effective but not explosive, making the under 3.5 call a comfortable win.
Analysis: A controlled game with both teams focusing on control and structure rather than risk, keeping goals to a minimum.
Analysis: Defenses dominated, resulting in a goalless draw. Neither team looked likely to concede, justifying the conservative goal expectation.
Analysis: Cerignola managed the game well with solid defense, never allowing Crotone into the contest, and scoring efficiently but not prolifically.
Analysis: An attacking spectacle with six goals; both teams committed to forward play, surpassing the threshold with ease.
Analysis: A lively contest exhibiting decisive finishing from both sides and only sporadic defensive resistance.
Analysis: Both teams registered on the scoreboard, indicating steady if unspectacular attacking play, hitting the anticipated mark.
Analysis: Cerignola’s efficient attacking combinations broke through Crotone’s defense twice, despite the match’s slower rhythm.
Analysis: Both sides looked dangerous at intervals, and each capitalized on defensive lapses for a goal, matching expectations in a balanced contest.
Analysis: Attacking efficiency from both teams, with several clear chances converted, made this prediction a confident success.
Analysis: Defensive vulnerabilities were evident as both teams created and finished opportunities; Hoffenheim II’s attack, in particular, repeatedly exposed Duisburg’s backline.
Analysis: Both squads showed technical attacking quality. Eindhoven’s attack, paired with Jong Ajax’s ability to respond, resulted in success for the both-to-score forecast.
Across the board, prediction accuracy was strong, especially where previous match statistics aligned with the actual match dynamics on the day.