Analysis Report - 2025-12-05
📱 Download Now On Google Play 🔮 View PredictionsAcross 1X2, goal totals, and both-teams-to-score markets, the prediction slate delivered a high overall hit rate. Low-scoring battles in Spain, France, Belgium, and Portugal contrasted with open, attacking encounters in the Dutch Eerste Divisie, where offensive quality and defensive fragility combined to produce goals.
In England, Salford City thrashed Leyton Orient 4–0, and the prediction on “12” (either side to win) landed comfortably at odds 1.29.
The complete absence of a contest—no draw ever looked likely—reflected Salford’s attacking sharpness and Orient’s defensive collapse, perfectly suiting a no-draw prediction.
In Belgium, Eupen won 1–0 away to Seraing, validating the X2 prediction (Eupen or draw) at odds 1.29.
A cautious, low-scoring game favored the stronger away side’s solidity; Seraing failed to create enough clear chances, so backing the visitors to avoid defeat aligned with the clear quality gap and proved accurate.
In France, Aubagne Air Bel and Rouen drew 1–1, and the X2 prediction (Rouen or draw) at odds 1.36 was correct.
Rouen avoided defeat in a tight encounter where neither side dominated; the prediction leaned on Rouen’s ability to stay competitive away from home, which matched the on-pitch balance.
The French match between Grenoble Foot and Nancy shows result “--:--”, so the 1X prediction (Grenoble or draw) at odds 1.40 remains unresolved.
With no final score, this prediction cannot yet be evaluated for accuracy or underlying tactical validation.
In Spain, Real Oviedo and Mallorca finished 0–0, confirming the Under 2.5 goals prediction at odds 1.53.
Two defensively disciplined sides created few clear chances; compact shapes and conservative risk-taking produced a goalless draw exactly in line with the expectation of a tight, low-scoring contest.
In the Netherlands, VVV-Venlo beat RKC Waalwijk 2–1, and the Over 2.5 goals prediction (odds 1.50) won.
Both teams contributed offensively, and the 1–2 scoreline showcased the Eerste Divisie’s typical open play: vulnerable defenses and direct attacking patterns created the three-goal threshold with room to spare.
FC Eindhoven hammered Jong PSV 4–0, easily justifying the Over 2.5 goals prediction at odds 1.44.
Eindhoven’s attacking dominance, combined with Jong PSV’s defensive frailties, meant the line was cleared by the hosts alone, underlining a strong offensive mismatch.
In France, Bastia and Red Star Paris ended 0–0, landing the Under 2.5 goals prediction at odds 1.50.
A cagey encounter with limited attacking risk and well-organized defenses produced almost no breakthrough moments, fitting perfectly with a low-goal expectation.
The French clash finished 1–1, and the Under 3.5 goals prediction at odds 1.23 was correct.
Both sides were competitive but not explosive in attack; the game produced moderate chances and a fair share of control in midfield, never threatening to push toward four or more goals.
In Belgium, Olympic Charleroi and Patro Eisden drew 0–0, validating the Under 3.5 goals prediction at odds 1.33.
With neither team able to convert or create sustained pressure, a total absence of goals meant the high-goal scenario was never in play.
In France, Villefranche and Caen shared a 1–1 draw, winning the Under 3.5 goals prediction at odds 1.23.
Both teams showed structure and balance, with occasional attacking moments but no extended chaos; this kind of controlled 90 minutes almost always stays under four goals.
In Portugal, Penafiel defeated Uniao Leiria 1–0, confirming the Under 3.5 goals prediction at odds 1.29.
Penafiel’s focus on defensive security and game control limited chances at both ends, producing a single-goal margin consistent with a cautious approach.
In France, Le Puy Foot 43 beat Versailles 78 3–0, validating the Over 1.5 goals prediction at odds 1.40.
The visitors’ clinical finishing and the hosts’ defensive issues ensured the two-goal mark was passed early, making this one of the day’s most straightforward outcomes.
In Portugal, rivals Benfica and Sporting CP drew 1–1, successfully meeting the Over 1.5 goals prediction at odds 1.30.
Big derbies tend to generate high tempo and decisive chances, and both elite attacks found the net once, matching the expectation of at least modest scoring.
Roda Kerkrade’s 2–3 loss to Jong AZ in the Netherlands smashed the Over 1.5 goals prediction at odds 1.17.
Both sides attacked aggressively, and defensive openness produced a wide, end-to-end game; the five-goal total far exceeded the low threshold, underscoring the Eerste Divisie’s high-scoring profile.
In Belgium, the same Olympic Charleroi vs Patro Eisden fixture that was predicted correctly as Under 3.5 finished 0–0, causing the Over 1.5 goals prediction at odds 1.29 to fail.
Neither side imposed itself in attack, and clear chances were scarce; the expectation of at least two goals overestimated offensive quality in what proved to be a risk-averse, low-tempo match.
In Germany, Rot-Weiss Essen and Stuttgart II ended 1–1, confirming the BTS prediction at odds 1.50.
Both sides showed enough attacking intent to breach each other’s defenses once, while neither backline was watertight, fitting the scenario where each team finds at least a single goal.
Clermont Foot and Boulogne drew 1–1, landing the BTS prediction at odds 1.83.
The match featured balanced play and open phases where each side created scoring opportunities, resulting in a goal apiece and validating the expectation of mutual scoring.
RKC Waalwijk’s 1–2 home defeat to VVV-Venlo in the Netherlands satisfied the BTS prediction at odds 1.50.
Again, the Eerste Divisie’s attacking nature was evident: both teams created enough chances, and loose defending allowed each side onto the scoresheet.
Almere City’s 3–2 win over Jong Ajax produced five goals and a winning BTS prediction at odds 1.50.
High-tempo attacking from both teams and suspect defensive structure, especially typical of reserve sides like Jong Ajax, drove a match where both attacks thrived and neither defense held firm.
Overall, predictions that correctly identified whether matches would open up or remain cagey—based on attacking firepower and defensive solidity—performed best across the board.