Analysis Report - 2025-09-13
📱 Download Now On Google Play 🔮 View PredictionsA diverse slate of football matches from global competitions was analyzed through predictions across five major markets: 1X2, Over/Under 1.5, Over/Under 2.5, Over/Under 3.5, and Both Teams To Score (BTS). This overview summarizes the outcomes, assesses the validity of each prediction, and highlights underlying match trends such as attacking or defensive strengths.
Competition: Egypt
Final Result: 1-1
Prediction: 1X (Home win or Draw)
Odds: 1.32
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: The prediction succeeded as the match ended in a draw. Both teams demonstrated defensive resilience and a balanced contest; with their relatively even odds and final score, this non-loss prediction was justified by comparable team strength and limited attacking edge for either side.
Competition: England
Final Result: 3-0
Prediction: 1 (Home win)
Odds: 1.36
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: Arsenal's dominant 3-0 victory was accurately anticipated. The significantly lower odds for Arsenal reflected their superior squad quality and home advantage, while Nottingham Forest struggled defensively, as shown by the three goals conceded.
Competition: Sweden
Final Result: 1-5
Prediction: X2 (Draw or Away win)
Odds: 1.41
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: A substantial away win by Olympic Malmo validated the X2 prediction. Olympic Malmo's potent attack (scoring five goals) and Torslanda’s defensive vulnerabilities contributed to the lopsided result.
Competition: Japan
Final Result: 1-0
Prediction: 12 (Home or Away win, no draw)
Odds: 1.33
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: The match produced a winner (Gamba Osaka 1-0), ensuring the 12 prediction held. The teams' similar pre-match odds and the result suggest a closely contested game with a single defensive lapse proving decisive.
Competition: Algeria
Final Result: 2-0
Prediction: Under 2.5
Odds: 1.37
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: A low-scoring match, with both sides displaying measured offense. The accurate under prediction was rooted in their historically conservative approach and solid defensive displays.
Competition: Malaysia
Final Result: 3-0
Prediction: Over 2.5
Odds: 1.34
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: Terengganu’s attacking strength was evident with a clear three-goal win, pointing to their offensive potential and Immigration FC’s defensive shortcomings, validating the prediction for multiple goals.
Competition: Wales
Final Result: 2-5
Prediction: Over 2.5
Odds: 1.44
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: Seven goals highlight both teams' weak defenses and attacking willingness, especially from away side Caernarfon Town. High-scoring trends were appropriately identified in the prediction.
Competition: Germany
Final Result: 2-4
Prediction: Over 2.5
Odds: 1.51
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: Another multi-goal game, with a total of six goals, supported by Hoffenheim II and Verl both prioritizing attacking play and showing defensive vulnerabilities.
Competition: Japan
Final Result: 1-2
Prediction: Under 3.5
Odds: 1.36
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: With only three goals, both sides managed to keep the total under the threshold with solid defensive organization.
Competition: Denmark
Final Result: 0-1
Prediction: Under 3.5
Odds: 1.33
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: Defensive strength was apparent; just one goal demonstrated Kolding and Hvidovre’s limited attacking edge and disciplined back lines.
Competition: South Korea
Final Result: 1-1
Prediction: Under 3.5
Odds: 1.33
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: The prediction relied on the defensive solidity typical in this fixture, translating into just two goals scored.
Competition: England
Final Result: 1-3
Prediction: Under 3.5
Odds: 1.33
Outcome: Incorrect
Analysis: Four goals led to the failure of this under prediction. Salford City’s attacking efficiency outweighed the anticipated defensive control, highlighting their ability to exploit Shrewsbury’s weaknesses.
Competition: Zambia
Final Result: 2-0
Prediction: Over 1.5
Odds: 1.34
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: With two goals scored, attacking superiority, especially from the home side Buffaloes, pushed the result over the line.
Competition: Poland
Final Result: ---
Prediction: Over 1.5
Odds: 1.33
Outcome: Correct (Result missing, outcome marked as won)
Analysis: While the specific score is missing, the correct outcome suggests at least two goals were scored, matching the expectation of open play from both sides.
Competition: Turkiye
Final Result: 1-2
Prediction: Over 1.5
Odds: 1.33
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: Three total goals, with both teams contributing, reflected a match-up with attacking intent and moderate defensive gaps.
Competition: Russia
Final Result: 1-1
Prediction: Over 1.5
Odds: 1.32
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: Each side found the net, and the draw ensured the prediction came through; both teams’ offensive contributions were crucial.
Competition: Norway
Final Result: 3-2
Prediction: Both Teams to Score
Odds: 1.50
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: A high-scoring affair saw both attacks excel and defenses falter, making BTS an accurate expectation.
Competition: Norway
Final Result: 5-2
Prediction: Both Teams to Score
Odds: 1.49
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: Seven goals with both teams scoring multiple times; attacking play dominated the day while defensive lapses were frequent.
Competition: Germany
Final Result: 3-1
Prediction: Both Teams to Score
Odds: 1.53
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: Both teams scored, confirming the trend of open play and opportunities on both sides.
Competition: Norway
Final Result: 1-1
Prediction: Both Teams to Score
Odds: 1.49
Outcome: Correct
Analysis: Each team managed a goal, justifying the prediction on the back of offensive initiative from both units.
This analysis indicates that understanding team style (defensive solidity, attacking aggression), competition context, and recent trends remain critical in predicting match outcomes with high accuracy.